EPA Publishes First-Of-Its-Kind Framework for Considering Cumulative Impacts Across Agency Actions
On November 21, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published Notice of a newly developed draft framework intended to provide all EPA programs with a shared reference point for determining when and how to analyze or consider cumulative impacts—defined broadly to include the totality of exposures to combinations of environmental stressors and their effects on health and quality-of-life outcomes. Keeping pace with the Biden administration EPA’s environmental justice drive, key goals of the Interim Framework for Advancing Consideration of Cumulative Impacts include empowering EPA to (1) more fully and accurately characterize the realities communities face, (2) pinpoint the levers of decision making and identify opportunities for interventions that improve health and quality of life while advancing equity, and (3) increase meaningful engagement, improve transparency, and center actions on improving health and environmental conditions in communities.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Proposes Broader Historic Preservation Review
On February 9, 2024, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) published a proposed rule that would amend the Corps permitting regulations to follow the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) implementing regulations as developed interpreted by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP). Specifically, the Corps proposes removing its own NHPA regulations, Appendix C from 33 CFR part 325, and replacing them with those promulgated by the ACHP at 36 CFR part 800. This change may lengthen the regulatory review process and expand the scope of the Corps’ NHPA review.
Louisiana Federal Court Enjoins EPA’s Use of Disparate Impact Requirements in State Permitting Actions
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana granted a preliminary injunction filed by the State of Louisiana seeking to halt the efforts of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in imposing disparate impact-based mandates under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act in permitting decisions. The state contends that Title VI prohibits only intentional discrimination and, as a result, EPA’s disparate-impact regulations in 40 C.F.R. §§ 7.10-180 are an unlawful attempt by EPA to impose its environmental justice policy goals in official permitting decisions. According to Louisiana, EPA’s efforts to advance disparate impact-based mandates without explicit statutory authorization runs afoul of the major questions doctrine, which requires agencies to act in accordance with explicit congressional mandate for matters of major political or economic significance.
