Dec 152023

The Enforcement Angle: David Uhlmann and OECA

Justin A. Savage
, , , , , ,

Join Sidley for the Environmental Law Institute’s People Places Planet Podcast series, “The Enforcement Angle.” Through this series, Sidley partners discuss state and federal enforcement of environmental laws and regulations with senior enforcement officials and thought leaders on environmental enforcement in the United States and globally. The featured guests offer their insights into the challenging environmental issues facing corporations today.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) develops the Agency’s national strategy to enforce compliance with federal environmental statutes. Led by assistant administrator, David M. Uhlmann, OECA sets national enforcement priorities, and coordinates with EPA regions and the U.S. Department of Justice to address environmental noncompliance, which can include civil and criminal actions. In this episode, Mr. Uhlmann joins Justin Savage to discuss OECA’s national and enforcement compliance initiatives for fiscal years 2024–2027, environmental justice, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and climate enforcement goals.

Listen here!

This post is as of the posting date stated above. Sidley Austin LLP assumes no duty to update this post or post about any subsequent developments having a bearing on this post.

Justin A. Savage

Washington, D.C.

jsavage@sidley.com

You might also like
U.S. EPA Removes Regulatory Affirmative Defense Provision Against Alleged Violations of Oil and Gas Facility NESHAPs

On October 22, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule removing an affirmative defense from Clean Air Act (CAA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations for the Oil and Natural Gas Production Facility and Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Facility Source Categories (Final Rule).[1] Prior to the Final Rule, owners or operators could assert an affirmative defense that alleged NESHAP standard violations were caused by an equipment malfunction.[2] A “malfunction” is defined as any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control and monitoring equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner.[3]

EPA Issues Final Rule for Major Source Reclassification Under Clean Air Act Section 112

On Tuesday, September 10, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a final rule establishing requirements for major sources of hazardous air pollutants — sources that emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons per year of a single hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year of a combination of hazardous air pollutants — that reclassify as area sources below these thresholds. Reversing a rule adopted during the Trump administration, the rule provides that sources emitting any of the seven persistent and bioaccumulative hazardous air pollutants listed under Section 112(c)(6) of the Clean Air Act must continue to comply with major source standards even if otherwise reclassified as area sources. As a result, reclassified sources will still be subject to maximum achievable control technology standards rather than less stringent standards applicable to area sources. In so doing, EPA maintains that at least 90% of the cumulative emissions of these pollutants will be subject to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regardless of future source reclassifications.

Recent Developments in U.S. EPA’s Hydrofluorocarbon Phasedown

There have been several recent developments in enforcement, litigation, and regulatory implementation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) phasedown of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).