Jun 292023

U.S. EPA Updates Environmental Justice Mapping Tool for a Third Time: EJSCREEN 2.2

Samuel B. Boxerman, Nicole E. Noëlliste and Brooklyn Hildebrandt
, , , ,

On June 26, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) announced via e-mail to its EJ ListServ the third update to its environmental justice (EJ) mapping and screening tool, EJSCREEN. EPA uses EJSCREEN to inform several Agency functions, including permitting, enforcement, outreach, and compliance.

EPA’s first update to the tool, EJSCREEN 2.0, added new indicators including an environmental indicator on underground storage tanks; a socioeconomic indicator on unemployment; a health indicator based on life expectancy, asthma, and heart disease based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; indicators on “critical service gaps,” including food deserts, medically underserved areas, and areas with limited broadband internet access; and a climate change indicator with data on droughts, sea-level rise, and wildfires.

The second update, EJSCREEN 2.1, integrated demographic data from the 2016–20 American Community Survey (ACS), and added environmental, demographic, and index data for U.S. territories, including the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The update also included a mapping function that allowed users to review multiple EJ indices simultaneously, which EPA intended would provide “a cumulative” view of burdens on EJ communities.

Among other features to improve the functionality of the tool, the tool’s third update, EJSCREEN 2.2,

  • adds a new indicator on Toxic Releases to Air, which quantifies the relative potential human health effects from exposure of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) chemicals—those chemicals EPA has identified as potentially causing (i) cancer or other chronic human health effects, (ii) significant adverse acute human health effects, or (iii) significant adverse environmental effects—consistent with priorities imposed by the Biden administration; on April 21, 2023, President Joe Biden issued Executive Order 14096: Revitalizing our Nation’s Commitment to EJ for All, which directed federal agencies to prioritize obligations under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act to notify communities near toxic releases from federal facilities and hold public meetings within six weeks of such releases regarding the related health risks and certain precautions
  • adds new map layers indicating (i) health disparities including cancer and persons with disabilities; (ii) critical service gaps on accessibility to housing, health insurance, transportation; and (iii) EPA-regulated facilities that are currently or have been out of compliance with environmental laws and regulations
  • integrates more recent demographic data from the 2017–21 ACS data from the U.S. Census

Stakeholders facing EPA enforcement or other actions should understand this screening tool, as EJ issues are informing how the agency may approach a particular site or decision. EPA is providing virtual trainings and “office hours” to help the public best understand how to use and apply the tool.

This post is as of the posting date stated above. Sidley Austin LLP assumes no duty to update this post or post about any subsequent developments having a bearing on this post.

Samuel B. Boxerman

Washington, D.C.

sboxerman@sidley.com

Nicole E. Noëlliste

Washington, D.C.

nnoelliste@sidley.com

Brooklyn Hildebrandt

Los Angeles

bhildebrandt@sidley.com

You might also like
U.S. EPA Announces New “Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Policy”

On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published its “Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Policy,” a landmark new internal enforcement policy for its civil and criminal enforcement offices (the Policy) that signals a paradigm shift in how the agency will assess, coordinate, and prosecute civil (including administrative) and criminal environmental enforcement. In the Policy, EPA states that it has already started increasing communication and collaboration between its enforcement offices in recent years, which EPA believes has led to better case screening and more consistent enforcement responses across regions. But the Policy goes far beyond those less formal efforts and reflects EPA’s stated goal to continue toward an integrated approach, moving away from its prior, more bifurcated approach to civil and criminal enforcement.

Fifth Circuit Limits EPA’s Attempts to Regulate PFAS Under Toxic Substances Control Act in Inhance Technologies v. EPA

On March 21, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated two U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) orders under Section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), holding that EPA had exceeded its statutory authority when it issued the orders in an attempt to regulate the manufacture of per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) by petitioner Inhance Technologies, LLC (Inhance). The Fifth Circuit’s decision comes after EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance announced its National Enforcement and Compliance Initiatives for Fiscal Years 2024 – 2027, which involve increased emphasis on addressing PFAS exposure and contamination through enforcement actions and potential additional regulations.

Louisiana Federal Court Enjoins EPA’s Use of Disparate Impact Requirements in State Permitting Actions

On Tuesday, January 23, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana granted a preliminary injunction filed by the State of Louisiana seeking to halt the efforts of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in imposing disparate impact-based mandates under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act in permitting decisions. The state contends that Title VI prohibits only intentional discrimination and, as a result, EPA’s disparate-impact regulations in 40 C.F.R. §§ 7.10-180 are an unlawful attempt by EPA to impose its environmental justice policy goals in official permitting decisions. According to Louisiana, EPA’s efforts to advance disparate impact-based mandates without explicit statutory authorization runs afoul of the major questions doctrine, which requires agencies to act in accordance with explicit congressional mandate for matters of major political or economic significance.