May 92023

The Enforcement Angle: Driving California Toward Carbon-Neutrality with Dr. Steven Cliff

Maureen F. Gorsen and Justin A. Savage
, , , , ,

Join Sidley for the Environmental Law Institute’s People Places Planet Podcast series, “The Enforcement Angle.” Through this series, Sidley partners discuss state and federal enforcement of environmental laws and regulations with senior enforcement officials and thought leaders on environmental enforcement in the United States and globally. The featured guests offer their insights into the challenging environmental issues facing corporations today.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is playing a major role in setting air quality standards across the country and the world. The agency works closely with scientists, industry, and other regulatory bodies to create a carbon-neutral California by 2045.

In this episode, Sidley Environmental partners Maureen Gorsen and Justin Savage speak with Dr. Steven Cliff, the executive officer of CARB, to discuss a host of topics including how CARB is considering environmental justice, rethinking and electrifying their transportation infrastructure, and automated driving. We also address his role as the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NHTSA in addressing ADAS, autonomous vehicles, motor vehicle safety, and fuel economy.

Listen here!

This post is as of the posting date stated above. Sidley Austin LLP assumes no duty to update this post or post about any subsequent developments having a bearing on this post.

Maureen F. Gorsen

Century City

maureen.gorsen@sidley.com

Justin A. Savage

Washington, D.C.

jsavage@sidley.com

You might also like
EPA Publishes First-Of-Its-Kind Framework for Considering Cumulative Impacts Across Agency Actions

On November 21, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published Notice of a newly developed draft framework intended to provide all EPA programs with a shared reference point for determining when and how to analyze or consider cumulative impacts—defined broadly to include the totality of exposures to combinations of environmental stressors and their effects on health and quality-of-life outcomes.  Keeping pace with the Biden administration EPA’s environmental justice drive, key goals of the Interim Framework for Advancing Consideration of Cumulative Impacts include empowering EPA to (1) more fully and accurately characterize the realities communities face, (2) pinpoint the levers of decision making and identify opportunities for interventions that improve health and quality of life while advancing equity, and (3) increase meaningful engagement, improve transparency, and center actions on improving health and environmental conditions in communities.

U.S. EPA Announces Fourth Update to Environmental Justice Mapping Tool: EJSCREEN 2.3

On July 9, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) announced a fourth update to its environmental justice (EJ) mapping and screening tool, EJSCREEN, under the Biden administration. EPA describes the tool as “a starting point for agency considerations of environmental justice” and generally uses the tool to identify areas that may have higher environmental burdens and inform several Agency functions, including permitting, enforcement, outreach, and compliance.

Jarkesy’s Potential Implications for EPA Administrative Proceedings

On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided SEC v. Jarkesy,[1] holding that when the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleges a defendant has violated securities antifraud provisions and seeks civil penalties, the defendant is entitled to a jury trial in federal court under the Seventh Amendment. The ruling restricts the SEC’s use of its own in-house administrative tribunal with its own administrative law judges (ALJs), which the SEC has historically used to pursue antifraud claims. While the Court’s ruling focuses on the SEC, the principles underlying the decision may be applied more broadly to restrict the ability of other federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to pursue civil penalties via their own administrative proceedings.