Dec 82022

U.S. EPA Adds 12 Chemicals to Toxics Release Inventory

Rob Abrams, Marshall R. Morales and Samuel B. Boxerman
, , , , ,

On November 30, 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a rule that adds 12 chemicals to the list of chemicals subject to Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting requirements.[1] Facilities that are covered by TRI and meet reporting requirements for these chemicals will now be required to report to EPA on quantities of these chemicals that are released into the environment or otherwise managed as waste. The first reports on these chemicals will be due to EPA July 1, 2024, for calendar year 2023 data.

In 2014, the Toxics Use Reduction Institute submitted a petition under Section 313(e) of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) requesting that EPA add 25 chemicals to the TRI. EPA evaluated the 25 chemicals to determine whether they met the TRI listing criteria of EPCRA Section 313(d)(2). In October 2021, EPA responded to the petition by proposing a rule to add 12 of the 25 chemicals to the TRI chemical list. The final rule was published on November 30, 2022, without any significant changes from the proposed rule. One of the chemicals was also designated as a persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemical with a reduced 100-pound reporting threshold.[2] With regard to the remaining 13 chemicals covered by the petition, EPA has separately already named three to the TRI chemical list[3] and decided not to add remaining 10 due to insufficient toxicity information or because the chemical was no longer produced in the U.S.

[1] dibutyltin dichloride; 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol; formamide; 1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta[g]-2-benzopyran (HHCB)*; n-hydroxyethylethylenediamine; nitrilotriacetic acid trisodium salt; p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenol; 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene; triglycidyl isocyanurate; tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate; tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate; tris(dimethylphenol) phosphate

[2] 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta [g]-2-benzopyran

[3] 1-bromopropane, nonylphenol, and 1,2,5,6,9,10-hexabromocyclododecane

This post is as of the posting date stated above. Sidley Austin LLP assumes no duty to update this post or post about any subsequent developments having a bearing on this post.

Rob Abrams

Marshall R. Morales

Samuel B. Boxerman

Washington, D.C.

sboxerman@sidley.com

You might also like
U.S. EPA Removes Regulatory Affirmative Defense Provision Against Alleged Violations of Oil and Gas Facility NESHAPs

On October 22, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule removing an affirmative defense from Clean Air Act (CAA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations for the Oil and Natural Gas Production Facility and Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Facility Source Categories (Final Rule).[1] Prior to the Final Rule, owners or operators could assert an affirmative defense that alleged NESHAP standard violations were caused by an equipment malfunction.[2] A “malfunction” is defined as any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control and monitoring equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner.[3]

EPA Issues Final Rule for Major Source Reclassification Under Clean Air Act Section 112

On Tuesday, September 10, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a final rule establishing requirements for major sources of hazardous air pollutants — sources that emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons per year of a single hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year of a combination of hazardous air pollutants — that reclassify as area sources below these thresholds. Reversing a rule adopted during the Trump administration, the rule provides that sources emitting any of the seven persistent and bioaccumulative hazardous air pollutants listed under Section 112(c)(6) of the Clean Air Act must continue to comply with major source standards even if otherwise reclassified as area sources. As a result, reclassified sources will still be subject to maximum achievable control technology standards rather than less stringent standards applicable to area sources. In so doing, EPA maintains that at least 90% of the cumulative emissions of these pollutants will be subject to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regardless of future source reclassifications.

Recent Developments in U.S. EPA’s Hydrofluorocarbon Phasedown

There have been several recent developments in enforcement, litigation, and regulatory implementation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) phasedown of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).